<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over 1200 against, one or two for &#8211; it can only be one thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandy4stalbans.org/blog/2009/07/20/over-1200-against-one-or-two-for-it-can-only-be-one-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandy4stalbans.org/blog/2009/07/20/over-1200-against-one-or-two-for-it-can-only-be-one-thing/</link>
	<description>Sandy Walkington campaigns with the Liberal Democrats across St Albans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:13:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Annand</title>
		<link>http://sandy4stalbans.org/blog/2009/07/20/over-1200-against-one-or-two-for-it-can-only-be-one-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Annand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandy4stalbans.org/wordpress/?p=717#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s just naughty. I am all in favour of moving freight from road to rail, but certainly not of building road freight hubs and disguising them as rail freight terminals. That&#039;s greenwash if ever I saw it. It looks as though the council indeed took the right decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s just naughty. I am all in favour of moving freight from road to rail, but certainly not of building road freight hubs and disguising them as rail freight terminals. That&#8217;s greenwash if ever I saw it. It looks as though the council indeed took the right decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

